home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
ftp.cs.arizona.edu
/
ftp.cs.arizona.edu.tar
/
ftp.cs.arizona.edu
/
icon
/
newsgrp
/
group92c.txt
/
000055_icon-group-sender _Tue Nov 3 06:06:52 1992.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1993-01-04
|
813b
Received: by cheltenham.cs.arizona.edu; Tue, 3 Nov 1992 05:03:39 MST
Via: uk.ac.manchester.computer-science; Tue, 3 Nov 1992 07:11:22 +0000
From: Steve Holden <steve@dtc.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 92 06:06:52 GMT
Message-Id: <3873.9211030606@desktop.desktop.co.uk>
To: icon-group@cs.arizona.edu
Subject: Re: Semicolons
Status: R
Errors-To: icon-group-errors@cs.arizona.edu
I only have a first-class honours degree in Computer Science, so I may not
understand this discussion properly, but it seems to _me_ that anyone who
argues against the semi-colon insertion probably would prefer Algol 68.
Good luck to them, I say. If they don't know what a dangling operator
looks like even when it's dangling in front of them then they should be
taken off the icon list immediately :-)
regards
Steve